A Physician May Violate Anti-Kickback Laws Even Without Steering Patients To A Specific Provider – Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences – United States

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently issued an interesting decision concerning the definition of “referral” in the context of federal anti-kickback laws. See U.S. v. Patel, No. 14–2607, 2015 WL 527549 (7th Cir. 2015).  In the Patel matter, the United States charged a Chicago-area physician with violating and conspiring to violate the Anti–Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a–7b (the “Statute”), alleging that the physician received undisclosed payments from a home health services provider for referring patients.The referral process at issue is summarized below:

via A Physician May Violate Anti-Kickback Laws Even Without Steering Patients To A Specific Provider – Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences – United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *